CO129-477 - Public Offices - 1922 — Page 399

4

possible to set one service off against the other,

I suppose that it may be necessary even though it

is somewhat undesirable-to pay something to the

existing men to get them to do the work, but I do

not see why future appointees should not be

called upon to proceed to Shanghai or Hongkong as

the case may be to help constitute an Appeal Court

as part of their normal duties.

The usual Treasury argument in these cases

-

takes the form of this dilemma either the man has

plenty of leisure in which case it is quite fair to

ask him to do the extra work without extra payı ol

else if he has no leisure the arrangement is an

unsound one and should not be permitted.

Yours sincerely

Dr Bridges

DRAFT.

E.E. Bridges Fez M.C

Mr.

MT.

Zeny

MINUTE.

HP 29

Beach 29

Mr. Collins 20

Mr. Davis.

Sir G. Grindle.

Sir H. Read.

Sir J. Masterton Smith.

Mr. Ormsby Gore.

Duke of Devonshire.

2 efri cons.

20. 46528/149.

Store2c

Dear L. Bridges

Here

G

Com

the 20

lec.

398

2 Jan 1922 1

you

سے جا کر کی

of the perprant that

has passed

Parlice of thongthong

thougtong shot

asti.

the subject

Fun Chirf

from time to time &

спесивые п

for China.

arrangement

of the C. f.

ď

to Shanghai

Count By Affect.

The 70. proposed that

to the commmeration cen

should be

the fac

at present

fres

ulation to the budge

of them

Aard

Key

A

Count of Affeal at Houghing;

asted

C

存

afte

a A

to their consulting the Eressing

financial arrangement without waiting:

for Hougtong's Aservations. We agreed, and